[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.hvbg.de/d/bgz/bgz_info/veranst/archiv_vera/bgz_fachv_nov_2005/seite02.htmlhttp://www.hvbg.de/d/bgz/bgz_info/pdf_bild_info/bgz_fach_nov_2005/pp_rentrop.pdfixA/S Inspecta Latvia & RSU DVVI, Working conditions and risks in Latvia, 2007.(Research working conditions and risks in Latvia 2005-2007).xCoordinamento delle Regioni e Province autonome, Rapporto conclusivo del progettonazionale di monitoraggio e controllo dell applicazione del D.Lgs.626/94, November 2003.xiTUC, Focus on Health and Safety.Trade Union trends survey 06/02.TUC biennial survey ofsafety reps 2006, London, 2006.xiiLO, Danske virksomheders brug af APV (Danish Companies use of Workplace RiskAssessment), April 2003.xiiiWhether the risk assessment process in your country is divided into more or fewer steps, oreven if some of the five steps are different, the guiding principles should be the same.xivA near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness or damage but hadthe potential to do so.xvReported in Health and Safety Practitioner, UK, 23.1, January 2005.xvihttp://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2005/e05095.htmxviihttp://ew2007.osha.europa.eu/europeansummit/ (see Stephen Fisher - Workshop 3).Ogólne informacje na temat kampanii Ocena ryzyka zawodowego 17
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]